<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ByREV &#187; Indexare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://byrev.blog-u.net/tag/indexare/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net</link>
	<description>O minte de geniu este intodeauna umbrita si de prostie - recunosc asta !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cat mai conteaza GOOGLE pentru unii ?</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/uncategorized/cat-mai-conteaza-google-pentru-unii.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/uncategorized/cat-mai-conteaza-google-pentru-unii.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algoritm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cautare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trafic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=3613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nu stiu la voi, dar la mine, sunt site-uri care au un trafic preponderent din alte surse decat google, cum ar fi Yahoo si Bing. Desigur, doar anumite siteuri au &#8220;atractia&#8221; asta spre alte motoare de cautare, dar este o mare diferenta intre sursele de trafic in comparatie cu 2-3 luni in urma, ceea ce [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/uncategorized/cat-mai-conteaza-google-pentru-unii.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTF &#8230; re-re-reindexing strike back !? &#8211; algoritmii de indexare</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/wtf-re-re-reindexing-strike-back-algoritmii-de-indexare.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/wtf-re-re-reindexing-strike-back-algoritmii-de-indexare.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chestii Tehnice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coputadoare si Interniet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1 Iulie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algoritmii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=1962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stiati ca google a schimbat ceva in algoritmii de indexare cu data de 1 IULIE ? &#8230; Daca nu, atunci aflati de la mine ca a schimbat &#8230; si asta a intrat in &#8220;operatiune&#8221; pe 1 iulie, la ora 9AM, ora romaniei. Ce anume ? Va las pe voi sa descoperiti. [ Short URL ... [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/wtf-re-re-reindexing-strike-back-algoritmii-de-indexare.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indexare nu este ILEGALA . PUNCT.</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/doar-ganduri/indexare-nu-este-ilegala-punct.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/doar-ganduri/indexare-nu-este-ilegala-punct.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doar Ganduri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalizare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motoare de cautare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muzica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piraterie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viitorul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google a castigat de N ori procese de asemenea forma privind indexarea mai ales si in special cand vine vorba de indexarea imaginilor cu sau fara drept de autor. Deci, faptul ca siteul este &#8220;SPECIALIZAT&#8221; in indexarea si punerea la dispozitie a fisierelor media (MP3, OGG, WMA, etc) nu inseamna ca incalca legea. Acel &#8220;intitle&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/doar-ganduri/indexare-nu-este-ilegala-punct.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indexarea cautarilor interne</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/indexarea-cautarilor-interne.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/indexarea-cautarilor-interne.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chestii Tehnice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beemp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beemp3.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cautari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indexarea cautarilor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toata lumea stie (aproape) ca motoarele de cautare (google) nu permit indexarea cautarilor interne dar, uite AICI, probabil unul dintre cele mai bune exemple cand indexare cautarilor interne da rezultate bune. [ Short URL ... ]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/chestii-tehnice/indexarea-cautarilor-interne.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: byrev.blog-u.net @ 2012-02-09 20:02:54 -->
