<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ByREV &#187; circulatie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://byrev.blog-u.net/tag/circulatie/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net</link>
	<description>O minte de geniu este intodeauna umbrita si de prostie - recunosc asta !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Se va anula taxa auto ?</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/se-va-anula-taxa-auto.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/se-va-anula-taxa-auto.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Idei Bune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anulare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=2646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cu ceva timp in urma am scris institutiilor abilitate despre necesitatea anularii taxei auto. Initial nu am stiut exact unde si am scris la Politia Romana, directia de circulatie (Direcţia Regim Permise de Conducere şi Înmatriculare a Vehiculelor) De aici, sesizarea a fost redirectionata pentru solutionare spre M.A.I. (Ministerul Administratiei si Internelor) , iar astazi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/se-va-anula-taxa-auto.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cine circula fara restrictii pe drumurile noastre ?</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/cine-circula-fara-restrictii-pe-drumurile-noastre.html</link>
		<comments>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/cine-circula-fara-restrictii-pe-drumurile-noastre.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diverse Abureli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idei Bune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulatie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coloana Infinitului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pompierii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvarea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soferi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tg-jiu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O intrebare capcana: Cine circula fara restrictii pe drumurile noastre ? oare cine ? Ppai din experienta mea ca sofer nu am vazut prea multe, ca nu am vechime, insa am observat ca exista doar 4 categorii de utilizatori ai soselelor care nu au acelasi restrictii ca omul de rand: Politia, Salvarea, Pompierii si CAII. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://byrev.blog-u.net/idei-bune/cine-circula-fara-restrictii-pe-drumurile-noastre.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: byrev.blog-u.net @ 2012-02-09 22:48:25 -->
