<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indexarea TAG-urilor din Bloguri &#8211; Spam sau NU ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://byrev.blog-u.net/coputadoare-si-interniet/indexarea-tag-urilor-din-bloguri-spam-sau-nu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/coputadoare-si-interniet/indexarea-tag-urilor-din-bloguri-spam-sau-nu.html</link>
	<description>O minte de geniu este intodeauna umbrita si de prostie - recunosc asta !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: byrev</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/coputadoare-si-interniet/indexarea-tag-urilor-din-bloguri-spam-sau-nu.html/comment-page-1#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>byrev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=1849#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Corect ... 

Ca idee, care ar fi pana la urma diferente intre indexarea unui tag pus manual si indexarea cautarilor in blog ? 
Atata timp cat rezultatele sunt diferite de 404, adica se gaseste ceva, nu vad de ce nu ar fi considerate taguri &quot;dinamice&quot; create de utiliaztori ... Desigur, o conditie ar fi excluderea unor cautari sub 3 caractere care chiar ca nu ar avea vre&#039;o relevanta si excluderea rezultatelor negative!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corect &#8230; </p>
<p>Ca idee, care ar fi pana la urma diferente intre indexarea unui tag pus manual si indexarea cautarilor in blog ?<br />
Atata timp cat rezultatele sunt diferite de 404, adica se gaseste ceva, nu vad de ce nu ar fi considerate taguri &#8220;dinamice&#8221; create de utiliaztori &#8230; Desigur, o conditie ar fi excluderea unor cautari sub 3 caractere care chiar ca nu ar avea vre&#8217;o relevanta si excluderea rezultatelor negative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mihai</title>
		<link>http://byrev.blog-u.net/coputadoare-si-interniet/indexarea-tag-urilor-din-bloguri-spam-sau-nu.html/comment-page-1#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>mihai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://byrev.blog-u.net/?p=1849#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>Atata timp cat tagul/tagurile returneaza rezultate relevante nu-l consider spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atata timp cat tagul/tagurile returneaza rezultate relevante nu-l consider spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/16 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: byrev.blog-u.net @ 2012-02-10 02:09:26 -->
